Thanks for explaining that. I have not come across that really before
though I do have another card I thought was a rookie and then figured
it wasn't so I am going to see if I can find it. So I apologize for
the previous post. I wonder though, doesn't this affect value. I
guess all Rookie cards aren't valuable though because a lot of
potential somebody's don't last. Then others are mediocre or average.
I am guessing Lee is a bit above average... I saw I got a decent deal
on the card, but it's not worth THAT much. I'll be getting it signed
though; I guess that could make it BETTER or WORSE. I have no clue
when it comes to baseball cards.
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:52:00 -0500, "Lee Cochenour"
Post by Lee CochenourSmith only pitched 21 innings in 1980 and 67 in 1981. It looks like he
started both those years in the minor leagues. The trading card companies
probably made cards for players that were on big league rosters or expected
to be at the beginning of the season. Smith broke through about halfway
throgh the 81 season, so 1982 was likely the first season that he started
the year with the team, hence his rookie card. The way MLB does stats, his
27 innings in 1980 weren't enough to categotrize him as a rookie. Officially
1981 was his rookie season, but it was too late for the card companies to
get his card out.
Lee
http://www.geocities.com/leecoke/
Post by Sue HEven on the MLB.com site (auctions) endorsed by Becketts (and they are
the ones who mailed the item to us), advertised the card we won in an
auction as "Rookie card" and it's not. So apparently, even these
sites can be fishy. I won't whine about it. Total was three bucks
including shipping, but gee friggin' whiz, is ANYONE out there
honest?!